Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science
Lassonde School of Engineering
Course Outline (Fall 2017)
SC/MATH 1090 3.0 A Introduction to Logic for Computer Science
Professor George Tourlakis Classes: CLH H 13:00-14:30, Mondays and Wednesdays.
First Class: September 11, 2017

DON'T PANIC :-)

(This course is very similar to a serious programming course; but easier)

Course Description:
  

Note: This course is a degree program requirement for Computer Science, Computer Security, and Computer and Software Engineering majors. It is expected and recommended to be taken in the second year of your studies as it is a prerequisite for a number of core (= required) 3rd year EECS courses.

Learning to use Logic, which is what this course is about, is like learning to use a programming language.

In the latter case, familiar to you from courses such as EECS 1021 3.0 or EECS1022 3.0, one learns the correct syntax of  programs, and also learns what the various syntactic constructs do and mean, that is, their semantics. After that, one spends the rest of the course on increasingly challenging programming exercises, so that the student becomes proficient in programming in said language.

We will do the exact same thing in MATH1090: We will learn the syntax of the logical language, that is,  what syntactically correct proofs look like. We will learn what various syntactic constructs "say" (semantics). We will be pleased to learn that correctly written proofs are concise and "checkable" means toward discovering mathematical "truths". We will also learn via a lot of practice how to write a large variety of proofs that certify all sorts of useful "truths" of mathematics.

While the above is our main aim, to equip you with a Toolbox that you can use to discover truths, we will also look at the Toolbox as an object of study and study some of its properties (this is similar to someone explaining to you what a hammer is good for before you take up carpentry). This study belongs to the "metatheory" of Logic.

The content of the course will thus be:

The syntax and semantics of propositional and predicate logic and how to build "counterexamples" to expose fallacies. Some basic and important  "metatheorems" that employ induction on numbers, but also on the complexity of terms, formulas, and proofs will be also considered. A judicious choice of a few topics in the "metatheory" will be instrumental toward your understanding of "what's going on here". The mastery of these metatheoretical topics will make you better "users of Logic" and will separate the "scientists" from the mere "technicians".

There are a number of methodologies for writing proofs, and we will aim to gain proficiency in two of them. The Equational methodology and the Hilbert methodology. In both methodologies an important required component is the systematic annotation of the proof steps. Such annotation explains why we do what we do and has a function similar to comments in a program.

OK, one can readily agree that a computer science student needs to learn programming. But Logic? Well, the proper understanding of propositional logic is fundamental to the most basic levels of computer programming, while the ability to correctly use variables, scope and quantifiers is crucial in the use of loops, subroutines, and modules, and in software design. Logic is used in many diverse areas of computer science including digital design, program verification, databases, artificial intelligence, algorithm analysis, computability, complexity, and software engineering. Besides, any science that requires you to reason correctly to reach conclusions uses logic.

Prerequisite: MATH 1190 3.00 or EECS/MATH 1019 3.00.
No Credit Retained (NCR) Note: This course is not open for credit to any student who has passed MATH 4290 3.0.

Course work and evaluation: There will be several (>= 4) homework assignments worth 24% of the total final grade. 

The homework must be each individual's own work. While consultations with the instructor, tutor, and among students, are part of the learning process and are encouraged, nevertheless, at the end of all this consultation each student will have to produce an individual report rather than a copy (full or partial) of somebody else's report.

Follow these links to familiarise yourselves with Senate's and Lassonde School's expectations regarding Academic Honesty, and Academic Integrity. Please also familiarise yourself with many other Senate policies, in particular, with those about Academic Accommodation for Students with Disabilities, Religious AccommodationRepeating Passed or Failed Courses for Academic Credit.

Please also check these two links! Student Rights and Responsibilities and Counseling and Disabiliy Services.


The concept of "late assignments" does not exist in this course (because full solutions are posted on the due date).

Last date to drop a Fall 2017 (3-credit) course without receiving a grade is Nov. 10, 2017.

There will also be one mid-term (in-class) test worth 33% Note Date/Time: Monday, October 30, 2017. 13:00-14:20.

Note: Missed tests with good reason (normally medical, and well documented) will have their weight transferred to the final exam. There are no "make up" tests. Tests missed for no acceptable reason are deemed to have been written and failed and are graded "0" (F).


Finally, there will be a Final Exam during the University's Exam period. It will be worth 43%.

Text: G. Tourlakis, Mathematical Logic, John Wiley & Sons, 2008. ISBN 978-0-470-28074-4

Learning Objectives:  Students are expected to:

  1. correctly use propositional semantics, including truth tables, to establish that an arbitrary propositional formula is a tautology, or a tautological consequence of certain formulas, or a contradiction.
  2. correctly use propositional and predicate logic semantics toward demonstrating that certain statements (formulas) are not theorems;
  3. correctly use axioms and rules of inference in formulating proofs (Hilbert style and Equational) in both propositional and predicate logics to certify syntactically the validity of mathematical statements (formulas); 
  4. correctly state and use the deduction theorem in proofs;
  5. correctly use resolution in propositional calculus as a proof technique;
  6. correctly use various techniques including mathematical induction to prove properties of the syntax of both propositional and predicate logics.
  7. correctly use the technique of adding and removing the universal and existential quantifiers in proofs;

If time permits: We will attempt to make time to cover a very brief introduction to computability from the Appendix of the text.



Last changed: Aug. 21, 2017