When riding your bicycle backwards down a one-way street, if the
wheel falls of a canoe, how many ball bearings does it take to fill
up a water buffalo?
Hello Howard.
Gandhi's speech:
Ours is not a drive for power, but purely a non-violent fight for India’s 
independence. In a violent struggle, a successful general has been often known 
to effect a military coup and to set up a dictatorship. But under the Congress 
scheme of things, essentially non-violent as it is, there can be no room for 
dictatorship. A non-violent soldier of freedom will covet nothing for himself, 
he fights only for the freedom of his country. The Congress is unconcerned as 
to who will rule, when freedom is attained. The power, when it comes, will 
belong to the people of India, and it will be for them to decide to whom it 
placed in the entrusted. May be that the reins will be placed in the hands of 
the Parsis, for instance-as I would love to see happen-or they may be handed 
to some others whose names are not heard in the Congress today. It will not be 
for you then to object saying, This community is microscopic. That party did 
not play its due part in the freedom’s struggle; why should it have all the 
power? Ever since its inception the Congress has kept itself meticulously free 
of the communal taint. It has thought always in terms of the whole nation and 
has acted accordingly. . .